Tyrone Devoil-El v. Michael Groose, Superintendent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a Batson pretext argument is not a “legal argument” anyway but an argument about a question of fact
• finding no pretext where “the combination of characteristics was different in the non-stricken venirepersons” than in the stricken venirepersons
• upholding a finding that the proffered reasons were nondiscriminatory where “Caucasian jurors sharing the same characteristics were not removed,” “because the combination of characteristics was different in the non-stricken venirepersons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).