United States v. Juan Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers had a reasonable, particularized suspicion to conduct a pat-down search when they observed a noticeable bulge in the right front pants pocket of an individual who was suspected of participating in a recent armed robbery
• finding reasonable suspicion to pat down an individual based, in part, on an observation of a “bulge in his pocket”
• \Although the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits the warrantless entry of a person's home . . . the prohibition does not apply when voluntary consent has been obtained\
• African-American potential juror’s experience as a victim of police brutality was a race-neutral reason for prosecutor to strike the potential juror “even though the repeated application of the reason might result in the disproportionate removal of black prospective jurors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).