Burke v. Harman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was not entitled to an instruction on nondisclosure, patterned after NJI2d Civ. 15.23, where plaintiffs theory of 'the case was limited to fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation claims
• in fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation action brought by artifact seller, it is “of no consequence” that the alleged recipient of the fraudulent misrepresentation is the seller instead of the buyer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).