· 8/9/1993
In Re Oracle Securities Litigation
Citations
- 829 F. Supp. 1176
- 1993 WL 306658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Here, because Oracle’s special 8 settlement committee lacked independent counsel, the derivative settlement reeks of collusion between derivative plaintiffs’ counsel and the individual defendants, at the expense of the corporation.”
- “There is no proof, however, that Arthur Andersen [Oracle’s auditor] deliberately or recklessly violated any duty it owed to the plaintiffs. In the absence of such proof, it is unlikely that plaintiffs could sustain them claims against Arthur Andersen.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.