Skip to main content
· 8/9/1993

In Re Oracle Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 829 F. Supp. 1176
  • 1993 WL 306658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Here, because Oracle’s special 8 settlement committee lacked independent counsel, the derivative settlement reeks of collusion between derivative plaintiffs’ counsel and the individual defendants, at the expense of the corporation.”
  • “There is no proof, however, that Arthur Andersen [Oracle’s auditor] deliberately or recklessly violated any duty it owed to the plaintiffs. In the absence of such proof, it is unlikely that plaintiffs could sustain them claims against Arthur Andersen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.