Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Oklahoma Supreme Court, under due process principles, could not order the reinvestigation of an attorney disciplinary grievance but also noting that the Board of Governors of the state bar could review the matter
• the rules governing legal practitioners are promulgated by this state’s Supreme Court in the exercise of its rule-making or legislative function
• supreme court itself could not order reinvestigation of attorney disciplinary grievance, since such was an executive function which it could not exercise consistently with minimum standards of due process
• the power to execute law is purely an executive function

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).