Tenth Circuit· 5/29/2002

Tuttle v. United States

Citations

291 F.3d 1238
48 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 682
89 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2740
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 10171
39 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that even though the debtor's “equitable arguments [under § 105(a)] are compelling, they cannot overcome the plain language of the Code”
explaining that dicta are statements “not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case” (quoting Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp., 53 F.3d 1181, 1184 (10th Cir. 1995))
post-petition interest on nondischargeable tax debt continues to accrue and remains an obligation of the debtor after entry of the discharge, if not paid by the estate
“[D]icta are ‘statements and comments in an opinion concerning some rule of law or legal proposition not necessarily involved nor essential to determination of the case at hand.’” (quoting Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp., 53 F.3d 1811, 1184 (10th Cir. 1995))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Henry, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tuttle v. United States

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.