· 9/4/2003
Midkiff v. Stewart
Citations
- 342 F.3d 1194
- 92 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6010
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18372
- 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 234
- 2003 WL 22054344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “[t]he hearing must be an adversary proceeding” and citing Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7001(4) (“[A] proceeding to object to or revoke a discharge [is an adversary proceeding].”)
- “[R]evocation of discharge . . . has the same effect as a denial of discharge. The revocation of a discharge makes the discharge a nullity.” (internal quotations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Holloway, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.