Skip to main content
· 9/4/2003

Midkiff v. Stewart

Citations

  • 342 F.3d 1194
  • 92 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6010
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18372
  • 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 234
  • 2003 WL 22054344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[t]he hearing must be an adversary proceeding” and citing Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7001(4) (“[A] proceeding to object to or revoke a discharge [is an adversary proceeding].”)
  • “[R]evocation of discharge . . . has the same effect as a denial of discharge. The revocation of a discharge makes the discharge a nullity.” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Holloway, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.