Oregon Supreme Court· 7/23/2009

State v. Ainsworth

Citations

213 P.3d 1225
346 Or. 524
2009 Ore. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a party’s decision to rely on the mistaken advice of counsel or a court clerk “rather than check the record personally at a time when doing so would reveal the true status of the judgment” did not excuse an untimely filing
noting that a party’s decision to rely on the mistaken advice of counsel or a court clerk ‘rather than check the record personally at a time when doing so would reveal the true status of the judgment’ did not excuse an untimely filing.’
a statement is not dictum if it concerns “the only issue addressed by the parties on appeal and resolved by the Court of Appeals”
a statement is not dictum if it concerns \the only issue addressed by the parties on 20 appeal and resolved by the Court of Appeals\
under ORS 18.082(1), “entry of the judgment, not notice of entry” triggers the deadline for filing a notice of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linder, Durham, De Muniz Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.