Turner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even assuming trial counsel was 22 deficient, the defendant could not show prejudice because the disputed testimony held minimal value to the State’s case
• concluding that the defendant could not show the required prejudice for his ineffective assistance of counsel claim because of other properly admitted evidence of his guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2024-12-10· cited 10×
• Scott v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-12-19· cited 6×
• Devanna v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-10-19· cited 1×
• Carrillo v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-05-06· cited 1×
• Cornelius Cupsa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-07-13
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2025-08-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Romer v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-07-01· cited 233×
• Wesley v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 208×
• Lawrence v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 108×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-06-03· cited 86×
• Kimbrough v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-02-06· cited 21×
• Mohamed v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-10-21· cited 16×
• Jacobs v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-08-19· cited 12×
• Starks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-08-20· cited 7×