Skip to main content

Starks v. State

Citations

  • 818 S.E.2d 507
  • 304 Ga. 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellant could not establish the prejudice required to show ineffective assistance in light of overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • holding that the defendant could not show prejudice on his ineffective-assistance claim that trial counsel should have * objected to the State's closing argument, in part because the trial court charged the jury that closing arguments should not be considered as evidence
  • holding that the defendant could not show prejudice on his ineffective assistance claim that trial counsel should have objected to the State’s closing argument, in part because the trial court charged the jury that closing arguments should not be considered as evidence
  • “Because there is no dispute that [the defendant] shot [the alleged victim] while committing two felonies, he could not claim self-defense, and the evidence therefore was overwhelming.”
  • evidence was sufficient to support felony murder conviction where appellant shot and killed armed victim during drug transaction despite conflicting testimony as to whether appellant or victim drew and fired his weapon first

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.