D. Kansas· 3/28/2008
Turner v. Close (In Re Close)
Citations
- 384 B.R. 856
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25872
- 2008 WL 836160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where no presumption of abuse arises, 30-day deadline imposed by § 704(b)(2) does not apply, and § 704(b)(1)(A) statement is not prerequisite for filing
- time runs from first date set for meeting of creditors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Julie A. Robinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fokkena v. Draisey (In Re Draisey)Eighth Circuit· 2008-10-16· cited 7×
- In Re MolitorS.D. Georgia· 2008-09-05· cited 7×
- In Re ClarkE.D. Tennessee· 2008-06-27· cited 6×
- In Re WiseD. Vermont· 2011-07-25· cited 5×
- In Re JasperE.D. Virginia· 2009-01-13· cited 2×
- In Re FennellD. South Carolina· 2008-09-02
- Habbo Fokkena v. Geoff DraiseyEighth Circuit· 2008-10-16
- In re DinardoD. Connecticut· 2016-10-04
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 2,720×
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,222×
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 1,044×
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 962×
- Norton Ex Rel. Chiles v. MathewsSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 304×
- Lopez-Soto v. HawayekFirst Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 90×
- Office of Thrift Supervision v. Overland Park Financial Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2001-01-05· cited 63×
- Rushton v. State Bank of Southern Utah (In Re Gledhill)Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-20· cited 46×
- In Re HartwickD. New Hampshire· 2007-02-12· cited 44×
- Rupp v. United Security Bank (In Re Kunz)Tenth Circuit· 2007-06-05· cited 42×
- F.H. Partners v. Investment Co. of Southwest (In Re Investment Co. of the Southwest)Tenth Circuit· 2006-04-28· cited 42×
- Carolina Casualty Insurance v. Pinnacol AssuranceTenth Circuit· 2005-10-07· cited 27×
- Barber v. Griffin (In Re Barber)D. Kansas· 1996-01-29· cited 20×
- McVay v. OteroW.D. Texas· 2007-07-23· cited 17×
- In Re RobertsonD. Minnesota· 2007-07-03· cited 17×
- Wieland v. ThomasD. Kansas· 2008-03-04· cited 16×
- In Re ByrneW.D. Arkansas· 2007-09-24· cited 12×
- In Re PerrottaD. New Hampshire· 2007-11-21· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.