Skip to main content
· 4/28/2006

F.H. Partners v. Investment Co. of Southwest (In Re Investment Co. of the Southwest)

Citations

  • 341 B.R. 298
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 665
  • 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 127
  • 2006 WL 1119200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering, with respect to adverse impact of relief sought on appéal, appellant’s representation it would not seek return of payments made to third parties
  • plan not feasible where there was no evidence to demonstrate how the debtor would be able to fund required balloon payments
  • plan not feasible where there was no evidence to demonstrate how the debtor would be able to fund required balloon payments
  • “Feasibility is the shorthand term for the requirement of confirmation as set forth in § 1129(a)(11
  • a bankruptcy court's determination of whether Chapter 11 plan is feasible is reviewed for clear error
  • “Whether a plan is feasible is a question of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard on appeal from an order confirming the plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Brown, Karlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.