Skip to main content
· 12/20/2005

Tummel & Carroll v. Quinlivan

Citations

  • 434 F.3d 314
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28078
  • 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 211
  • 2005 WL 3469702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a debt established under a state law breach of contract theory of recovery could be excepted from discharge under § 523(a)(2)(A)
  • providing that questions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Clement, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.