Stephen Thompson v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting appellant’s argument that new trial motion was valid motion which tolled time for filing notice of appeal if their rule 1.904(2) motion for enlarged findings and conclusions was not, and concluding appeal time was tolled by latter motion
• “[A] claim involving a future interest arises or exists when the interest appears of record, not when it vests, becomes possessory, or becomes actionable.”
• discussing section 614.17A and its predecessors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).