Tuma v. Kerr County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a temporary injunction was void when it set forth no reasons why an injury would result in the absence of a temporary injunction
• rejecting mere conclusory statements and noting that “the trial court’s amended temporary -3- 04-18-00589-CV injunction sets forth no reasons at all why injury will result in the absence of a temporary injunction” and is thus void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).