Kotz v. Imperial Capital Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that although “every piece of real estate is unique” and property’s “uniqueness may . . . constitute some evidence of an irreparable injury,” “that alone is not conclusive”
• stating although real estate’s “uniqueness may . . . constitute some evidence of an irreparable injury,” “that alone is not conclusive” and observing no authority states “trial court is relieved of the mandatory requirements of Rule 683 in cases involving real estate”
• “The trial court must set forth specific reasons, not merely conclusory statements, in the order granting temporary injunctive relief.”
• “[I]t is necessary to give the reasons why injury will be suffered if the interlocutory relief is not ordered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).