Tucker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trial court does not abuse its discretion by not conducting a Nelson inquiry when the defendant’s “dissatisfaction with counsel is articulated in terms of general complaints which do not suggest ineffective assistance of counsel”
• defendant’s claim that counsel believed defendant was guilty did not require Nelson hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Maxwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 20×
• Penn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-14· cited 5×
• Gonzales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-29· cited 4×
• Montgomery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-06· cited 4×
• LeGrand v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-31· cited 3×
• Hillman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-18· cited 1×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-05· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nelson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-28· cited 400×
• Lowe v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 55×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-06· cited 54×
• Branch v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-21· cited 54×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-30· cited 27×
• Augsberger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-19· cited 25×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-04-05· cited 15×
• Comer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-23· cited 11×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-09-10· cited 8×
• Burgos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-16· cited 6×