District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/23/1999
Comer v. State
Citations
- 730 So. 2d 769
- 1999 WL 152659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court’s exclusion of the defendant’s sole witness without conducting a Richardson hearing was error, since the issue of prejudice to the State was not addressed by the court
- reversing where the trial court precluded a late-listed defense witness from testifying without conducting a Richardson hearing or considering less severe sanctions
- “Clearly, the Richardson requirements apply also where the defense committed the discovery violation.” (citing Brazell v. State, 570 So.2d 919, 921 (Fla.1990))
- “In assessing procedural prejudice, the trial court must determine, first, whether the discovery violation precluded the aggrieved party from adequately preparing for trial, and second, what is the proper sanction to invoke for the discovery violation.”
- “ ‘In a criminal ease, the exclusion of a defense witness for a discovery violation implicates a defendant’s sixth amendment right to present witnesses as well as the fundamental right to due process.’ M.N. v. State, 724 So.2d 122[, 124 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tucker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-10· cited 9×
- Fabregas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-14· cited 6×
- Holley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-20· cited 5×
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-18· cited 4×
- PINTADO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-14· cited 2×
- SANCHEZ-ANDUJAR v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-15· cited 2×
- R.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-10· cited 1×
- THE STATE OF FLORIDA v. MICHAEL JONESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-06-02
- Nweze v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17
- D.M.T., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-07-05
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-28· cited 400×
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 199×
- Hardwick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 198×
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-08· cited 161×
- Czubak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-08· cited 132×
- Gurganus v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 57×
- Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 55×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-06· cited 54×
- Branch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-21· cited 54×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-06-07· cited 49×
- Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-02-08· cited 45×
- Wilder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-09-24· cited 43×
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-17· cited 32×
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-17· cited 30×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-27· cited 28×
- Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-01· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.