District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/31/2010
LeGrand v. State
Citations
- 31 So. 3d 924
- 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4186
- 2010 WL 1347318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that generalized dissatisfaction with counsel’s representation or trial strategy does not render the representation ineffective
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marstiller, Wolf, Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-02-28· cited 400×
- Gudinas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-10· cited 111×
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 104×
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-12· cited 78×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-06· cited 54×
- Branch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-11-21· cited 54×
- Watts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-02· cited 44×
- Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-03· cited 12×
- Haugabook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-19· cited 10×
- Tucker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-10· cited 9×
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-02· cited 5×
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-10· cited 3×
- Hogarth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.