S.D. Ohio· 6/3/2019
Tucker v. Nelson
Citations
- 390 F. Supp. 3d 858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[E]vidence can be relevant even if it does not relate to a fact in dispute, provided the evidence supplies background information about a party or issue”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marbley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-10-15· cited 2,897×
- Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Sixth Circuit· 1975-07-03· cited 318×
- Nelson v. WaxmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-01-11· cited 99×
- Dortch v. FowlerSixth Circuit· 2009-11-30· cited 94×
- Ward v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-12-01· cited 39×
- Jackson v. BuchmanSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-07-22· cited 30×
- Rockwood v. SinghAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-13· cited 28×
- John L. Campbell v. Madhav Vinjamuri, M.D. And Terry WardEighth Circuit· 1994-03-30· cited 27×
- McCray v. SALAH UDDIN SHAMS, MD, SCAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-10· cited 26×
- Gipson v. YounesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1998-10-02· cited 22×
- Beis v. DiasMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-07-16· cited 18×
- Coal Resources, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1989-01-13· cited 13×
- Lynn Richard Norton v. Gail Colyer, Sheriff of Greene County, TennesseeSixth Circuit· 1987-09-10· cited 10×
- O'Loughlin v. Mercy Hospital FairfieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.