Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving a situation where the parties conducted a trial under an order prohibiting references to three pending cases involving the same plaintiff and three other similarly situated defendants
• stating motions in limine that “exclude broad categories of evidence should rarely be employed”
• cautioning against “orders in limine that exclude broad categories of evidence”
• “A better practice is to deal with questions of admissibility of evidence as they arise.”
• “A better practice is to deal with questions of admissibility of evidence as they arise.”
• “A better practice is to deal with questions of admissibility of evidence as they arise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).