Rockwood v. Singh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where a physician who has been sued for malpractice testifies as an expert, evidence regarding his age, practice, and failure to pass board-certification examinations is relevant and admissible
• holding that, where a physician who has been sued for malpractice testifies as an expert, evidence regarding his age, practice, and failure to pass board-certification examinations is relevant and admissible
• recognizing that where a physician testifies as an expert, “evidence as to his age, practice, and like matters relating to his qualifications as an expert is admissible”
• determining because the defendant did not testify as an expert, evidence of his failure to pass a board-certification examination was properly barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).