Tucker v. Kilgore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “offensive character” of the words spoken to be sufficient to infer malice because the defendant did not have personal knowledge of the facts communicated, and did not exercise reasonable care in determining the truth prior to communication
• finding as defamation per se statement about police officer that he was “of limited traning (sic), no culture and a professional moocher, who strikes you for 50c or a dollar every time he meets you on the streets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).