Roche v. Egan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that letter related to officer’s fitness for office based on one of its allegations, even if the rest could be considered purely personal
• “The nature and extent of the responsibility of a police detective is punctuated by the fact that a firearm, no less than a badge, comes with his [or her] office”
• “Maine adheres to the widely recognized common law rale that a jury may not apportion damages for a single injury caused by joint, or concurrent, tortfeasors”
• “police detective . . . vested with substantial responsibility for the safety and welfare of the citizenry in areas impinging most directly and intimately on daily living”
• all law enforcement personnel, including police detective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).