CMI, Inc. v. Intoximeters, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because both torts were related, both required similar proof of damages
• noting that an interference with contract action requires proof that the third-party breached the contract
• setting forth the elements essential to recovery for tortious interference with a contract in Kentucky
• refusing to adopt § 766A on behalf of Kentucky courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).