Skip to main content

True v. State

Citations

  • 954 N.E.2d 1105
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1816
  • 2011 WL 4852227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “presence” for purposes of Indiana Code section 35-42-2-1.3(b)(2) is “defined as knowingly being within either the possible sight or hearing of a child”
  • “ ‘Presence’ is defined as knowingly being within either the possible sight or hearing of a child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Robb, Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.