Skip to main content

Trotter v. State

Citations

  • 825 So. 2d 362
  • 2002 WL 1926682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “double jeopardy is not implicated in the context of a resentencing following an appeal of a sentencing issue”
  • “[D]ouble jeopardy is not implicated in the context of a resentencing following an appeal of a sentencing issue.”
  • “[D]ouble jeopardy is not implicated in the context of a resentencing following an appeal of a sentencing issue.”
  • “The scope of the Double Jeopardy Clause is the same in both the federal and Florida Constitutions.”
  • “The scope of the Double Jeopardy Clause is the same in both the federal and Florida Constitutions.”
  • “The scope of the Double Jeopardy Clause is the same in both the federal and Florida Constitutions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.