· 6/9/1992
Cohens v. Elwell
Citations
- 600 So. 2d 1224
- 1992 WL 123334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, even when a mistrial is declared because of the unavailability of a “critical” state witness, reviewing court should apply a “ ‘strict scrutiny’ test” to determine whether “manifest necessity” existed
- the scope of the double jeopardy clause in the Florida Constitution is the same as that in the federal constitution
- critical witness unavailable due to severe illness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.