Skip to main content
· 6/9/1992

Cohens v. Elwell

Citations

  • 600 So. 2d 1224
  • 1992 WL 123334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, even when a mistrial is declared because of the unavailability of a “critical” state witness, reviewing court should apply a “ ‘strict scrutiny’ test” to determine whether “manifest necessity” existed
  • the scope of the double jeopardy clause in the Florida Constitution is the same as that in the federal constitution
  • critical witness unavailable due to severe illness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.