Skip to main content
· 1/22/2003

Cheshire v. State

Citations

  • 95 S.W.3d 820
  • 80 Ark. App. 327
  • 2003 Ark. App. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that due process requires a probationer to be informed of the conditions of his probation he is alleged to have violated, but holding that the denial of that right must be presented to the trial court for it to be preserved for appellate review
  • acknowledging that due process requires a probationer to be informed of the conditions of his probation he is alleged to have violated but holding that the denial of that right must be presented to the trial court for it to be preserved for appellate review
  • “While it is true that appellant’s right to due process required that he be given notice of the conditions of probation he was alleged to have violated, it is also true that the denial of any right, even a constitutional one, must be objected to at trial to be preserved for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry Crabtree

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.