Tenth Circuit· 7/26/2006
Trevizo v. Adams
Citations
- 455 F.3d 1155
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the party seeking certification “must show ‘under a strict burden of proof’ that all four requirements are clearly met” (quoting Reed v. Bowen, 849 F.2d 1307, 1309 (10th Cir. 1988))
- upholding district court ruling that a group of eighty-four class members was insufficient to warrant class certification
- upholding district court ruling that a group of eighty-four class members was insufficient to warrant class certification
- upholding district court ruling that a group of eighty-four class members was insufficient to warrant class certification
- upholding district court ruling that a group of eighty-four class members was insufficient to warrant class certification
- upholding district court ruling that a group of eighty-four class members was insufficient to warrant class certification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Tenth Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 209×
- Brown v. PerezTenth Circuit· 2016-11-08· cited 183×
- CGC Holding Co. v. Broad & CasselTenth Circuit· 2014-12-08· cited 134×
- Vallario v. VandeheyTenth Circuit· 2009-02-04· cited 104×
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceTenth Circuit· 2009-12-29· cited 35×
- Ruggles v. Wellpoint, Inc.N.D. New York· 2008-09-24· cited 15×
- Valencia v. Colorado Casualty InsuranceD. New Mexico· 2007-08-08· cited 4×
- Lucero v. NEW MEXICO LOTTERYD. New Mexico· 2009-02-02· cited 2×
- In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2021-12-15
- VEST MONROE, LLC v. DOESupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-09-04
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 1,936×
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,222×
- Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2006-07-03· cited 602×
- Bryant v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeTenth Circuit· 2005-12-20· cited 277×
- J.B. Ex Rel. Hart v. ValdezTenth Circuit· 1999-08-12· cited 220×
- Shook v. El Paso CountyTenth Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 202×
- Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationTenth Circuit· 1995-09-06· cited 184×
- Trevizo v. AdamsTenth Circuit· 2006-07-26· cited 165×
- Burnham v. Humphrey Hospitality Reit Trust, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2005-03-04· cited 109×
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Magnetek, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2004-02-25· cited 101×
- Monreal v. RunyonTenth Circuit· 2004-05-17· cited 84×
- Coye Peterson v. The Oklahoma City Housing Authority, a Public Corporation and State AgencyTenth Circuit· 1976-12-01· cited 78×
- Johnson v. ThompsonTenth Circuit· 1992-08-06· cited 60×
- Polich v. Burlington Northern, Inc.D. Montana· 1987-05-21· cited 25×
- Panaderia La Diana, Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.D. Utah· 2004-11-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.