CGC Holding Co. v. Broad & Cassel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The district court abuses its discretion when it misapplies the Rule 23 factors-either through a clearly erroneous finding of fact or an erroneous conclusion of law-in deciding whether class certification is appropriate.\
• “Because class action litigation remains ‘an exception to the usual rule that litigation is conducted by and on behalf of the individual named parties only,’ the requirements of Rule 23 are heavily scrutinized and strictly enforced.”
• “When addressing class certification, the district court must undertake a ‘rigorous analysis’ to satisfy itself that the prerequisites of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are met.” (quoting Dukes, 564 U.S. at 350–51)
• adopting the Eleventh Circuit’s test for determining predominance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).