Monreal v. Runyon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that individual discrimination claims can be exhausted through a class administrative complaint
• finding that plaintiffs “simply have not articulated a policy – besides generalized non-compliance with Title VII – that could be the subject of injunctive or declaratory relief” and that the court could not certify a class under Rule 23(b)(2)
• declining to reach threshold class certification requirements because the plaintiffs failed to sat- isfy Rule 23(b)’s requirements
• affirming the denial to certify a class under Rule 23(b)(2) where it was “clear from the pleadings … that the primary relief sought is monetary damages”
• “For these reasons, we conclude that Plaintiffs exhausted their individual claims through presentation in the class complaint[J”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).