Trenkler v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• § 2255 designed to address claim that sentence was in excess of term allowed by law
• petitioner’s claim was “incompatible with engagement of the savings clause” because it did not “charge that [the] sentence is beyond the statutory maximum for the crimes of conviction” or assert actual innocence
• “Any motion filed in the district court that imposed the sentence, and substantively within the scope of § 2255 para. 1, is a motion under § 2255, no matter what title the prisoner plasters on the cover.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).