Barreto-Barreto v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \§ 2255 explicitly states that the limitations period 'shall apply' to all motions made under § 2255\
• holding that “the limitations period ‘shall apply’ to all motions made under § 2255”
• holding that “the limitations period ‘shall apply’ to all motions made under § 2255”
• noting that the \extraordinary circumstances\ standard focuses on the circumstances surrounding the late filing of the habeas petition, rather than the circumstances surrounding the underlying action
• holding “the discovery of a new legal theory 3 does not constitute a discoverable ‘fact’ for purposes of § 2255(f)(4)”
• pointing out that “[n]othing in the language of § 2255 suggests that jurisdictional challenges are exempt from the one-year limitations period” and holding that such petitions “are not exempt from § 2255’s filing deadline”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).