Supreme Court· 1/7/1952
United States v. Hayman
Citations
- 342 U.S. 205
- 72 S. Ct. 263
- 96 L. Ed. 2d 232
- 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2560
- 96 L. Ed. 232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, because habeas remained available as a last resort, it was unnecessary to “reach constitutional questions”
- noting that “a proceeding under Section 2255 is an independent and collateral inquiry into the validity of the conviction”
- explaining that § 2255 was enacted as a functional equivalent for habeas corpus to allow federal prisoners to bring a collateral attack in the court that imposed the sentence rather than a court that happened to be near the prison
- explaining that § 2255 was enacted as a functional equivalent for habeas corpus to allow federal prisoners to bring a collateral attack in the court that imposed the sentence rather than a court that happened to be near the prison
- explaining that § 2255 directs post-conviction litigation to the district of conviction to avoid the practical problems that existed before § 2255, when all litigation was brought by a writ of habeas corpus in the district of confinement
- explaining that § 2255 directs post-conviction litigation to the district of conviction to avoid the practical problems that existed before § 2255, when all litigation was brought by a writ of habeas corpus in the district of confinement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vinson, Black, Douglas, Minton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
723 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court· 1977-05-02· cited 3,882×
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 3,215×
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court· 1973-02-28· cited 2,787×
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 2,713×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,750×
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,450×
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilThird Circuit· 1997-08-15· cited 1,045×
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court· 1995-04-18· cited 1,015×
- People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-05-10· cited 1,008×
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 1,000×
- Jimmy Walker v. J.T. O'brien, and Joseph W. Finfrock v. Craig A. HanksSeventh Circuit· 2000-06-22· cited 965×
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 948×
- MacKey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 945×
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court· 1977-12-07· cited 871×
- Miller v. MarrTenth Circuit· 1998-04-14· cited 635×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 3,147×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court· 1935-01-21· cited 1,837×
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 1,320×
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 1,157×
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1936-05-25· cited 684×
- Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1941-02-10· cited 684×
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 667×
- Moore v. DempseySupreme Court· 1923-02-19· cited 518×
- Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court· 1807-02-20· cited 488×
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1948-06-21· cited 305×
- Holiday v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 303×
- People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals· 1951-03-08· cited 232×
- Dorsey v. GillD.C. Circuit· 1945-02-26· cited 167×
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Supreme Court· 1946-12-09· cited 155×
- Johnson v. HoySupreme Court· 1913-02-03· cited 116×
- Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenTenth Circuit· 1950-03-15· cited 89×
- United States v. PagliaSecond Circuit· 1951-07-19· cited 82×
Other cases named United States v. Hayman
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.