S.D. New York· 3/15/1979
Transcon Lines v. A. G. Becker Inc.
Citations
- 470 F. Supp. 356
- 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a party‘s right to acquire a security did not make that party the beneficial owner of the security because such a right was contingent on the occurrence of external events
- noting that the precise question is not clearly answered by the statute, its regulations, or legislative history
- in the context of other securities regulations, the difference between control and controlling influence is one of degree
- in the context of other securities regulations, the difference between control and controlling influence is one of degree
- defendant not a beneficial owner of plaintiffs stock under Rule 13d-3 because his right to acquire the stock was contingent upon a future event
- TSC materiality standard applicable to Schedule 13D context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzSecond Circuit· 2001-05-02· cited 553×
- Aron Rosenberg v. Xm Ventures, a Maryland Trust and Motient Corporation, a Delaware CorporationThird Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 114×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,731 Arnold S. Wellman v. Fairleigh S. Dickinson, Jr.Second Circuit· 1982-06-24· cited 90×
- Dan River, Inc. v. Unitex Ltd.Fourth Circuit· 1980-05-29· cited 57×
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1979-12-14· cited 46×
- Avnet, Inc. v. Scope IndustriesS.D. New York· 1980-11-25· cited 33×
- Levner v. SaudS.D. New York· 1994-10-17· cited 23×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corp.District of Columbia· 1988-06-15· cited 21×
- Vladimir v. Bioenvision Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-03-31· cited 14×
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Madison Fund, Inc.S.D. New York· 1982-10-04· cited 13×
- Camelot Industries Corp. v. Vista Resources, Inc.S.D. New York· 1982-03-29· cited 13×
- Trane Co. v. O'Connor SecuritiesS.D. New York· 1983-03-31· cited 13×
- Management Assistance Inc. v. EdelmanS.D. New York· 1984-03-06· cited 9×
- Cartica Management, LLC v. CorpBanca, S.A.S.D. New York· 2014-09-25· cited 8×
- Morales v. New Valley Corp.S.D. New York· 1998-03-20· cited 7×
- Chock Full O'Nuts Corp. v. FinkelsteinS.D. New York· 1982-10-06· cited 6×
- Polaroid Corp. v. DisneyD. Delaware· 1988-10-14· cited 4×
- Medtox Scientific, Inc. v. Morgan Capital L.L.C.D. Minnesota· 1999-06-03· cited 3×
- Medtox Scientific, Inc., Formerly Known as Editek, Inc. v. Morgan Capital, L.L.C., Alex Bistricer, David BistricerEighth Circuit· 2001-08-03· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1979-12-14· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 428×
- Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Second Circuit· 1969-01-24· cited 197×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,610 the Susquehanna Corporation v. Pan American Sulphur CompanyFifth Circuit· 1970-03-13· cited 67×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,068 General Aircraft Corporation v. Irwin S. LampertFirst Circuit· 1977-05-26· cited 67×
- S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.D. Massachusetts· 1979-01-17· cited 65×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,196 Corenco Corporation v. Schiavone & Sons, Inc., and Chester K. Twiss, Additional to CounterclaimSecond Circuit· 1973-10-26· cited 54×
- Applied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.S.D. New York· 1977-01-03· cited 36×
- Jewelcor Incorporated v. PearlmanS.D. New York· 1975-05-06· cited 26×
- Copperweld Corporation v. ImetalW.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-10-23· cited 23×
- Nicholson File Company v. HK Porter CompanyD. Rhode Island· 1972-04-13· cited 16×
- Texasgulf, Inc. v. Canada Development CorporationS.D. Texas· 1973-09-05· cited 16×
- National Home Products, Inc. v. GrayD. Delaware· 1976-05-18· cited 14×
- Graphic Sciences, Inc. v. International Mogul Mines Ltd.District of Columbia· 1974-10-18· cited 11×
- Twin Fair, Inc. v. RegerW.D. New York· 1975-05-07· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.