Skip to main content
· 5/2/2001

Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter Stolz

Citations

  • 249 F.3d 115
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “S13(d) encompasses not only the isolated shareholder who accumulates shares of a corporation’s common stock, but also a group of shareholders who undertake the same activity as part of a collective effort.”
  • stating that when both parties move for summary judgment “each party’s motion must be examined on its own merits, and in each case all reasonable inferences must be drawn against the party whose motion is under consideration”
  • finding \group\ where allegations were of an agreement for purpose of allowing purchase of shares in Quintel
  • when considering cross-motions for summary judgment, \all reasonable inferences must be drawn against the party whose motion is under consideration\
  • “[E]ven -when both parties move for summary judgment, asserting the absence of any genuine issue of material fact, a court need not enter judgment for either party.”
  • “[E]ven when both parties move for summary judgment ... a court need not enter judgment for either party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Jacobs, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.