S.D. New York· 1/3/1977
Applied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
Citations
- 425 F. Supp. 1145
- 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no apparent reason why any given action may not be taken ‘in connection with’ a development reasonably certain to take place in the future”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edward Weinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Seventh Circuit· 1981-07-06· cited 269×
- Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.S.D. New York· 1983-09-16· cited 70×
- S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.D. Massachusetts· 1979-01-17· cited 65×
- O'Connor & Associates v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.S.D. New York· 1981-12-30· cited 55×
- Warner Communications, Inc. v. MurdochD. Delaware· 1984-03-16· cited 52×
- Lewis v. McGrawSecond Circuit· 1980-04-03· cited 33×
- Berman v. Gerber Products Co.W.D. Michigan· 1978-07-19· cited 32×
- Transcon Lines v. A. G. Becker Inc.S.D. New York· 1979-03-15· cited 28×
- Crane Co. v. Harsco Corp.D. Delaware· 1981-03-13· cited 23×
- Hanna Mining Co. v. Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.N.D. Ohio· 1982-06-11· cited 22×
- Humana, Inc. v. American Medicorp, Inc.S.D. New York· 1977-12-28· cited 20×
- Lang v. BergerS.D. New York· 1977-02-08· cited 19×
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp.D. Maryland· 1982-09-22· cited 19×
- Asarco Inc. v. CourtD. New Jersey· 1985-05-06· cited 19×
- Panter v. Marshall Field & Co.N.D. Illinois· 1980-03-03· cited 18×
- Camelot Industries Corp. v. Vista Resources, Inc.S.D. New York· 1982-03-29· cited 13×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,483 the Indiana National Bank and Merchants National Bank & Trust Company of Indianapolis v. Mobil Oil CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1978-06-19· cited 12×
- Pryor v. United States Steel Corp.S.D. New York· 1984-07-02· cited 10×
- Reserve Management Corp. v. Anchor Daily Income Fund, Inc.S.D. New York· 1978-09-28· cited 8×
- In the Matter of City Investing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-10-14· cited 8×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court· 1970-03-03· cited 3,186×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 1,399×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court· 1963-12-09· cited 780×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 764×
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncSecond Circuit· 1953-06-30· cited 497×
- Cabell v. MarkhamSecond Circuit· 1945-06-04· cited 489×
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court· 1946-01-14· cited 471×
- Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 428×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesSecond Circuit· 1973-07-03· cited 358×
- Checker Motors Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation, Checker Taxi Company, Inc., Additional on CounterclaimSecond Circuit· 1969-01-06· cited 239×
- Gustave Gerstle, (Cross-Appellants) v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., (Cross-Appellee)Second Circuit· 1973-05-09· cited 233×
- Old Dominion Box Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-10-15· cited 224×
- Triebwasser & Katz, a Partnership Consisting of Jonah Triebwasser and William Katz v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanySecond Circuit· 1976-05-17· cited 220×
- Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp.Second Circuit· 1969-01-24· cited 197×
- List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Second Circuit· 1965-01-04· cited 188×
- Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanSecond Circuit· 1967-08-14· cited 154×
- GAF Corp. v. MilsteinSecond Circuit· 1971-12-13· cited 136×
- International Controls Corp. v. VescoSecond Circuit· 1974-01-15· cited 130×
Other cases named Applied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.