Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/28/2009
Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.
Citations
- 153 Wash. App. 870
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to the extent a claim of a contract’s unconscionability does not challenge the arbitration clause in particular, a request for declaratory relief is an issue for the arbitrator
- holding that to the extent a claim of a contract's unconscionability does not challenge the arbitration clause in particular, a request for declaratory relief is an issue for the arbitrator
- deciding the legal questions presented without reference to the economic loss rule
- deciding the legal questions presented without reference to the economic loss rule
- finding the fact that arbitration provision “was a boilerplate provision and could not be deleted from the agreement” to be “insufficient to establish procedural unconscionability”
- looking to comments to the Uniform Arbitration Act as aids in construing the Washington statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appelwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- River House Development, Inc. v. Integrus ArchitectureCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-03-15· cited 56×
- Gandee v. LDL Freedom Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2013-02-07· cited 55×
- Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2012-01-05· cited 49×
- David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationEleventh Circuit· 2017-09-26· cited 43×
- Verbeek Properties, LLC v. GreenCo Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-20· cited 38×
- Woodall v. AVALON CARE CENTER-FEDERAL WAYCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-10· cited 29×
- Romney v. Franciscan Medical GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-17· cited 28×
- In re the Marriage of PascaleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-25· cited 26×
- Public Utility District No. 2 v. Comcast of Washington IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-10-13· cited 23×
- Woodall v. Avalon Care Center—Federal Way, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-10· cited 22×
- Jennifer Wiese, Resps. v. Square Two Financial Corp., App.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-17· cited 18×
- Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. Yates, Wood & MacDonald, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-02-01· cited 15×
- Verbeek Properties v. Greenco EnvironCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-20· cited 13×
- Borish v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-05-04· cited 12×
- DeFelice v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-05-26· cited 12×
- Rimov v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-06-20· cited 7×
- Estate Of Dr. Michael Romney v. Franciscan Medical GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-07-10· cited 6×
- Shanghai Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Kung Da ChangCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-12· cited 3×
- Biochron, Inc. v. Blue Roots, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-05-25· cited 3×
- Lisa R. Pascale, Resp. v. Michael J. Pascale, App.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-25
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 1,641×
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court· 1993-09-16· cited 206×
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 178×
- Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 161×
- Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-31· cited 160×
- McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court· 2008-08-28· cited 134×
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 110×
- Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLCWashington Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 90×
- Baker v. CITY SEATTLEWashington Supreme Court· 1971-04-22· cited 87×
- Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-05-02· cited 71×
- Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 69×
- Stein v. Geonerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-02-20· cited 56×
- Olmsted v. MulderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-27· cited 52×
- Lewis River Golf, Inc. v. O.M. Scott & SonsWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 43×
- NACHES VLY. SCH. DIST. v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-08· cited 39×
- Lake Washington School District No. 414 v. Mobile Modules Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-12-30· cited 36×
- Naches Valley School District No. JT3 v. CruzenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-08· cited 31×
- Powell v. Sphere Drake Insurance P.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-09· cited 18×
- McClure v. Davis Wright TremaineCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-03-20· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.