Scott v. Cingular Wireless

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitration provision that expressly precluded class actions violated the policy behind the CPA and was therefore unconscionable
• recognizing that majority of jurisdictions uphold class action waivers but citing cases from fifteen jurisdictions holding that class action waivers in arbitration agreements were substantively unconscionable
• holding that an arbitration provision that expressly precluded class actions violated the policy behind the CPA and was therefore unconscionable
• holding that an arbitration provision that expressly precluded class actions violated the policy behind the CPA and was therefore unconscionable
• contending that class actions are “often the only meaningful redress available for small but widespread injuries”
• noting the “state policy favoring aggregation of small claims for purposes of efficiency, deterrence, and access to justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).