Toto v. PRINCETON TP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff’s hostile-work- environment claim was time-barred as his complaint was filed more than two years following the final alleged act of harassment
• “A constructive discharge claim is more difficult to prove than a hostile work environment claim . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).