Skip to main content
First Circuit· 4/30/2008

Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-Cancel

Citations

  • 524 F.3d 331
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9312
  • 2008 WL 1886642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lower court's reduction of attorney fee award for block billing was not an abuse of discretion
  • explaining that reasonableness in the context of time management “is largely a matter of informed judgment”
  • explaining that a material error of law is a per se abuse of discretion
  • noting that “fees for [work on a fee petition] are often calculated at lower rates than those deemed reasonable for the main litigation”
  • noting that “fees for [work on a fee petition] are often calculated at lower rates than those deemed reasonable for the main litigation”
  • stating that a prevailing party \normally is entitled to attorneys' fees incurred in the pursuit of fees\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Selya, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-Cancel

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.