Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
First Circuit· 7/5/2011

Spooner v. EEN, INC.

Citations

  • 644 F.3d 62
  • 99 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1219
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13650
  • 2011 WL 2611768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A court is duty-bound to notice, and act upon, defects in its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte.”
  • “A court is duty-bound to notice, and act upon, defects in its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte”
  • “A court is duty-bound to notice, and act upon, defects in its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte”
  • “A court is duty-bound to notice, and act upon, defects in its subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte.”
  • “If the requested fees are gluttonously high, a court has discretion to deny fees entirely.”
  • \Copyright cases are a prime example of a situation in which obtaining non-monetary relief or establishing a principle may be worth considerably more than the damages recovered.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Selya, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Spooner v. EEN, INC.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.