Rosario-Urdaz v. Rivera-Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the need for a hearing before issuance of a preliminary injunction must be determined flexibly
• explaining that “evidentiary hearings are often desirable at the preliminary injunction stage,” but an evidentiary hearing is not necessary “[i]f the trial court has before it competing submissions of evidentiary quality, or if the facts are essentially undisputed”
• affording respect to presider’s 14 decision not to convene evidentiary hearing when the facts are essentially undisputed
• “Where a plaintiff stands to suffer a substantial injury that cannot be adequately compensated by an end-of-case award of money damages, irreparable injury exists.”
• “Where a plaintiff stands to suffer a substantial injury that cannot adequately be compensated by an end-of-case award of money damages, irreparable harm exists.”
• “Where a plaintiff stands to suffer a substantial injury that cannot adequately be compensated by an end-of-case award of money damages, irreparable harm exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).