Torgerson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that material change standard applied to the interpretation of Washington statute, which provides that no new offer was required in any “renewal or replacement” policy
• “The fact specific question is: Have there been material changes in coverage which make the policy a ‘new' policy?”
• addition of new vehicle alone does not create a new policy warranting new rejection of UIM coverage equal to liability limits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).