Taruc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insured’s failure to remember discussion with insurance agent whose routine business practice was to inform customers of right to increase UIM limits was insufficient to defeat summary judgment for insurer
• law that requires insurers to offer increased coverage option does not require every contingency—such as whether UIM coverage applies when the named insured is not occupying a covered vehicle—to be explained in detail
• law that requires insurers to offer increased coverage option does not require every contingency — such as whether UIM coverage applies when the named insured is not occupying a covered vehicle — to be explained in detail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).