Second Circuit· 3/20/2019
Tooly v. Schwaller
Citations
- 919 F.3d 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Due Process Clause is violated when a claimant is deprived of a protected liberty or property interest without adequate process.”
- “Because Tooly never appeared for the interrogation meeting, we cannot say with certainty what would have occurred at the meeting, or whether the meeting would or would not have been fair.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calabresi, Livingston, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- White v. PaulySupreme Court· 2017-01-09· cited 2,504×
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillSecond Circuit· 2002-06-04· cited 1,331×
- City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court· 2015-05-18· cited 1,017×
- Connie Robison v. Susan R. Via and Harold HarrisonSecond Circuit· 1987-06-17· cited 642×
- Brown v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2015-08-19· cited 167×
- Bolmer v. OliveiraSecond Circuit· 2010-02-08· cited 156×
- Cerrone v. BrownSecond Circuit· 2001-04-10· cited 107×
- Russell v. CoughlinSecond Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 82×
- Bryant v. EganSecond Circuit· 2018-05-16· cited 5×
Other cases named Tooly v. Schwaller
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.