Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 2/8/2010

Bolmer v. Oliveira

Citations

  • 594 F.3d 134
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2600
  • 2010 WL 424591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “negligently inflicted harm is categorically beneath the threshold of constitutional due process” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • observing that § 1983 claim for involuntary commitment requires the commitment decision “be the product of criteria substantially below those generally accepted in the medical community.”
  • utilizing these three “prongs of Georgia” to guide analysis of a Title II sovereign immunity question
  • recognizing open question regarding Gross’s extension to ADA claims
  • confining review of denial of immunity on summary judgment to “the facts favorable to [the plaintiff] that the trial judge concluded the jury might find, including those it did not explicitly identify but likely assumed” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[P]endent appellate jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly, if ever.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Wesley, Kahn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bolmer v. Oliveira

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.