Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/16/1985
Tonka Tours, Inc. v. Chadima
Citations
- 372 N.W.2d 723
- 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 430
- 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a determination of good faith requires factual findings that this court cannot make on appeal
- stating that whether a party acts in good faith is, essentially, a credibility question
- stating that whether party acted in good faith is, essentially, a credibility determination
- stating the common law rule that if a party does or promises to do what he is already legally obligated to do, there is insufficient consideration to support the new promise
- stating the common law rule that if a party does or promises to do what he is already legally obligated to do, there is insufficient consideration to support the new promise
- appellate courts defer to district court credibility determinations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-02· cited 94×
- Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-05-22· cited 72×
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-12-30· cited 68×
- Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-09-10· cited 42×
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.S.D. Florida· 1999-07-06· cited 36×
- Eisenschenk v. EisenschenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-09-09· cited 32×
- Deli v. HasselmoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-01-30· cited 26×
- Marriage of Kampf v. KampfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-06-12· cited 21×
- Marriage of Hemmingsen v. HemmingsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-07-07· cited 19×
- Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-09· cited 17×
- Matter of Estate of HoffbeckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-24· cited 17×
- Casserlie v. Shell Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-01-06· cited 17×
- Sullivan v. OuimetCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-19· cited 15×
- Schulz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-02-10· cited 15×
- Citizens National Bank of Madelia v. Mankato Implement, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-09· cited 15×
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.S.D. Florida· 1999-08-10· cited 14×
- Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C & C Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-11-21· cited 11×
- Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp. v. J.W.C.J.R. Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-25· cited 10×
- Herbst v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-12-06· cited 9×
- Whalen Ex Rel. Whalen v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-08· cited 8×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-05-23· cited 62×
- Jurek v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-04-16· cited 43×
- State v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-05-02· cited 22×
- McDonald v. StonebrakerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-06-17· cited 13×
- Shelton v. FarkasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-11-05· cited 12×
- Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-09-11· cited 2×
- Palmer v. Safe Auto Sales, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York· 1982-07-02· cited 2×
Other cases named Tonka Tours, Inc. v. Chadima
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.