Skip to main content
· 1/30/1996

Deli v. Hasselmo

Citations

  • 542 N.W.2d 649
  • 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 614
  • 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 97
  • 1996 WL 33054

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although spouses are not in privity for res judicata purposes based solely on their marital status, when they jointly own real property they are in privity for causes of action related to that property
  • holding that although spouses are not in privity for res judicata purposes based solely on their marital status, when they jointly own real property they are in privity for causes of action related to that property
  • noting that “two parties who have similar interests in the same realty are in privity” under Minnesota law
  • “Consideration is something of value given in return for a performance or promise of performance that is bargained for; consideration is what distinguishes a contract from a gift.”
  • “[C]onsideration is what distinguishes a contract from a gift.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amundson, Klaphake, Harten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.